The pie charts show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000.
The given pie charts compare how the proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Hong Kong and Britain during the period of 2000.
Looking at the comparisons, In Hong Kong the greatest proportion of expenditure was on housing with 32%, while this figure accounts for 18% in Britain. Whereas, the percentage of other goods and services registered with higher amount in Britain than in Hong Kong, being 36% and 28% respectively. Furthermore, Food came in second place in Britain, at 22%, while annual proportion was bigger (27%) in Hong Kong.
By contrast, In Britain, another major spending was transport, with 17% , but this was much lower in Hong Kong being 9%. Clothing indicated the smallest percentage of expenditure in both countries. There was 7% spending on clothing in Britain, meanwhile, it was almost half of this percentage (4%) in Hong Kong.
Overall, the data indicates that housing, other goods and services and food were the main consumption in both countries, however, transport and other goods and services took up higher percentage in Britain than in Hong Kong in the year 2000.
- people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from Bluesky University in 2006 entiring different employment sectors. 56
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g 36% and 28% respectively. Furthermore, Food came in second place in Britain, at...
^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r major spending was transport, with 17% , but this was much lower in Hong Kong be...
^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using, other goods and services and food were the main consumption in both countr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70164459295 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.573944036 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339339435115 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15548795821 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791236605172 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217934489402 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792995422782 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.