The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA
between 1920 and 2000
The graph demonstrated some striking similarities between the Chinese and the us birth rates from 1920 to 2000. Both countries experienced considerable fluctuations in the similar period with some lows and some highs during the 1930s.
The birth rates in china rose from 10% in 1920 to 15% in 1935. later, the figure plunged to a low of 5% in the 1940s and was followed by an exponential growth to the peak of 20% in 1950. Next, the fertility rate dropped sharply to 8% in the following five years. finally, the figure declined gradually to 3% during the latter half of the century.
Meanwhile, the us had similar birth rate of 12% to that of china in 1920. The figure fluctuated in between 12% and 14% during 1920s and 1930s until it hit a low of 4% in 1945. five years later, the birth rate reached a peak at 15% in 1950 but it made a steady fall to the final figure of around 7% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | kissbiss | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Immosan | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Many people believe that its better to learn something in a group rather than individually To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make?has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Later
...a rose from 10% in 1920 to 15% in 1935. later, the figure plunged to a low of 5% in t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...rply to 8% in the following five years. finally, the figure declined gradually to 3% du...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1920s'.
Suggestion: during the 1920s
...igure fluctuated in between 12% and 14% during 1920s and 1930s until it hit a low of 4% in 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Five
...1930s until it hit a low of 4% in 1945. five years later, the birth rate reached a p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39520958084 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42805326293 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7523228234 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5555555556 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244628356725 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112848228881 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121418146463 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168259298572 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258944921778 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.