The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.
People have different views about regardless of whether technology is more and more widespread in education. However, I completely disagree with the idea that technology will replace teachers in the classroom. This essay will view and analyze the controversy from various perspectives.
It is important to recognize that the role of teachers is essential in stimulating and bringing up the curiosity of learners. One reason for this is that traditional education helps this world more realistic and allow the young group to get a healthy life. For instance, more and more children obsess over the virtual world so the teachers have a role more important than ever. It is understandable that technology cannot alter teachers because of the ability to convey inspiration.
Unquestionably, teaching is not the only thing that a teacher does in the classroom. A very significant aspect of that is to observe closely and focus on the learning process including their feedback and their status. Given that students misunderstand the topic in a classroom, teachers will try their best to rephrase the topic, change the way to make it clear until students can comprehend the content. However, a computerised teacher would be less in-tune with what students need.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that technology can have the amount of enormous knowledge, but it does not create motivation for pupils to be successful. Therefore, technology will never take the place of the teacher in the classroom. It is predicted that technology will become useful equipment to support for teacher in the instruction of their pupils.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Hidu | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Thu Phung | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-03 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
- THE BAR GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE NUMBER OG TOURISTS THAT TRAVELED TO SYDNEY AUSTRALIA IN THE FOUR YEAR PERIOD FROM 1997 TO 2000 THE OLYMPICS GAMES WERE HELD IN SYDNEY IN SEPTEMBER 2000 45
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not technology is more and more widespread ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23448275862 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94640997621 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.883143675 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400360923325 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127278610662 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918500553767 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230742026351 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663841860022 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.