TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
The passage discusses ethanol fuel and states that ethanul is not a suitable replacement for gasolin for several reasons. In contrast, the professor rejects all three reasons by stating that ethanol is a good alternative for fossil fuels like gasoline. Consequently, the teacher provides three reasons to support her idea.
First, the passage asserts that increasing the use of ethanol cannot help to solve environmental problems like global warming. Like gasoline, ethanol release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. So, the ethanol is another source of pollution. However, the lecture refutes this reason by explaining that for producing ethanol there is need to plants like corns. So, these plants during their growth time will absorb carbon dioxide. As a result, teh amount of this gas will decrease in the environment.
Second, the reading claims that producing huge amounts of ethanol will decrease the plants available for feeding animals. While the professor rebuts this reason by describing that for manufacturing ethanol they yse cellulose which is a part of plant that cannot eat by animals. Cellulose has a rigid structure and is not eatable. So, using these rigid parts to produce fuel will not reduce the food source of animals.
Third, based on tha passage the cost of ethanol cannot compete with the cost of gasoline. Farthermore, the only reason that the prices of these fuel sources are similar is because of the government's help. If the government eliminates the subsisies of the ethanol, the price of this fuel will increase quicly. The professor confirms that it is right, but she explains that by govenment's help the production of the ethanol will increase and these increases lead to decrease in the cost of ethanol. Eventually, ethanol will compete with gasoline as a clean fuel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | alta | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | thethethethethe | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | rena1071 | 76 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
- TOEFL TPO 08 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (teh) must be used with a third-person verb: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...absorb carbon dioxide. As a result, teh amount of this gas will decrease in the enviro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18835616438 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62546629731 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530821917808 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7158340384 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495110056641 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168953436988 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915486388734 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3107370272 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468742643536 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.