TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading explains that ethanol is not as good fuel as gasoline and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer claims that ethanol can be an alternative for gasoline and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the passage says that the use of ethanol causes a bad effect on global warming by emitting carbon dioxide. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by stating that burning ethanol fuel doesn't add to global warming. According to the lecturer, plants absorb carbon dioxide when growing up, so the amount of carbon dioxide when burning them should not be concerned.
Second, the article claims that food for animals will decrease as we produce more amounts of ethanol. Nonetheless, the lecturer says that the resource of ethanol is gained from crops that farm animals don't eat. Therefore, the lecturer believes that food for such animals will not reduce.
Third, the reading states that ethanol fuel is much more expensive than gasoline without the financial help by governments. However, the lecturer opposes this point by claiming that ethanol fuel will be competitive in terms of money after the amount of use increases. The lecturer introduces the research that says if the use of ethanol fuel is three times as much as now, the price of it will be declined by forty percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | alta | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | thethethethethe | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | rena1071 | 76 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nt by stating that burning ethanol fuel doesnt add to global warming. According to the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is gained from crops that farm animals dont eat. Therefore, the lecturer believes t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38334000427 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8189393808 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450055899631 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181031092815 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558527881868 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275311506397 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479023451837 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.