TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading states that after forest fires in Yellowstone, the "let it burn" policy was criticized by three points. However, the professor claims that the policy is fundamentally good and refutes each points given in the passage.
First, the article says that because of the fire, trees and other vegetation were extremely damaged. On the other hand, the professor refutes this point by stating that the fire gives some plants opportunities to grow in the park. She gives an example of small plants that appeared after the forest fire.
Second, the reading claims that animals and their food chains are also affected like plants. Nonetheless, the professor says that the opportunity for some animals to live in new places is made by the fire. The professor also explains that the food chains in Yellowstone got stronger thanks to the fire.
Third, the passage states that the fire results in negative influences on the number of tourists to visit the park. However, the professor opposes this point by claiming that the combination between the fire and the decline in the value of the park is not proper. According the professor, many visitors come to the park even after the forest fires in 1988.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, nonetheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02475247525 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48635626051 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7316710639 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335994934246 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134026201409 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533801774002 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203665721395 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03833480643 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.