TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task
Teachers have a large influence on students' thinking because students spend a lot of time with teachers in classes. Therefore, how teachers teach students in the classroom should be discussed. I disagree with the statement that teachers' viewpoints should not be known to students for the following reasons.
To begin with, students are likely to get interested in political problems when they know their teachers' viewpoints on such problems. In my opinion, students should consider political problems and having interests can be the first step for them to consider. For example, when I was a junior high school student, one of my teachers told that he didn't support the prime minister and explained the reasons. Before the lecture, I had thought that political decisions were always correct and never considered politics. Knowing his political views makes me interested in politics. This example clearly illustrates that teachers making their viewpoints known to students is a good way for students to have interests in political matters.
Moreover, thanks to the lecture of teachers' views, students can broaden their horizons for social or political problems. Though someone may disagree, I believe that knowing how other people including teachers are thinking about certain matter is significant for students. Let me introduce an example to support this point. One of my high school teachers had extremely conservative views and told what he thought about social problems in his class. I didn't agree with the statement made by him, but his viewpoints were new to me and helpful to reconsider my opinions.
As I stated above, knowing teachers' social or political views is a good way for students to get interested in and consider problems occurring in society. Therefore, I strongly stand by my opinion that teachers' viewpoints on social or political problems should be aware to students.
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task 3
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 60
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
Teachers have a large influence on students thinking because students spend a lot o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...tudent, one of my teachers told that he didnt support the prime minister and explaine...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t about social problems in his class. I didnt agree with the statement made by him, b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29470198675 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75751482088 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483443708609 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1733921485 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9375 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.