The article explains that Torreya taxifoha is facing a danger of being extinct and suggests three ways to prevent them from dying out. However, the professor refutes each of the author's points.
First, the reading says that planting Torreya in the same place where it naturally thrived is a good way to save the species because the environment there is suitable for Torreya. The professor disputes this point by stating that the microclimate in the northern part of Florida has changed due to the global warming. She claims that it gets drier in that place so Torreya is unlikely to survive.
Second, the article proposes that Torreya should be moved to a different place. Nonetheless, the professor says that the move of the species by human can do harm to the ecosystem. She introduces an example to explain this point. According to the professor, moving some species to other location causes an unpredictable influence to the environment such as the extinction of a certain species.
Third, the reading states that preserving Torreya in research centers helps scientists protect and study it. The professor opposes this point by claiming that such preservation makes Torreya weak for a disease in a long term. She also explains that the capacity of research centers is limited so the population of the species is not enough to save them.
Therefore, the main points made by the professor cast doubt on the main points made in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...move of the species by human can do harm to the ecosystem. She introduces an exam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61792444993 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56378600823 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0496228889 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9230769231 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327017485156 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116454885916 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916076109693 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172016182308 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970604887705 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.