Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars have been used for hundreds of years. At the beginning were invented with an old fashion machinery but nowadays cars are more sophisticated. Also, the industry of automobiles has a great competition between all brand of car that exist today, so I do not believe that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. In the following essay, I will explain why I think so.
First of all, cars are the most important mean of transportation for many people. Not only in small towns people use cars to travel, but also in metropolitan areas have become in the principal way to move from one place to another. The Era of bus and train is already non-useful and the reason of why people will be use more their own transportation is because the industry of automobile every year catch the attention of the customers with the innovation of new devices for automobiles, such as reverse camera that make it easy when people have to parking, also the GPS that helps you to find and address. Consequently, people get attracted for all of that and prefer has their own car. For instance, I went to New York about ten weeks ago and there were many people driving their own cars on the highways. The metro bus station was completely empty. Also, I realized that there were many brands of automobiles such as Mercedes Benz, Ford, Toyota and others. Seems that people did not like to travel anymore in public transportation so I believe that the industry of transportation will increase in the future.
Second, cars have been used for many years and they never have become no useful, instead dealers have increase the sales of them in the last twenty years. Dealers not only sale their cars but also, they have the opportunity to their costumer to lease the cars. This is a great opportunity because many people do not have money to buy a car, so they can lease for a period of time and then return it with the possibility to get a new one. My personal experience is an example of this. About three years ago a leased a car for two years. My lease ended and now the dealer gave the opportunity to get a better offer because I was eligible for. At this moment, I am driving a new car with cero miles and it is the car that I dreamt for. If the dealers and companies give all that opportunities to their costumer cars will never disappear.
In conclusion, for all that I mention above I do not believe that in twenty years will be a fewer cars. Unlikely will be more people that will want to buy their cars. As a result, the industry would be force to produce more n
- elephants have a surprising behavior 65
- progress is always good 60
- in twenty years will be a fewer cars than there are today. do you agree or disagree 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- asteroids are good for three reasons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essay, I will explain why I think so. First of all, cars are the most importan...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...portation will increase in the future. Second, cars have been used for many yea...
^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'become'.
Suggestion: have never become
... have been used for many years and they never have become no useful, instead dealers have increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y to buy a car, so they can lease for a period of time and then return it with the possibility...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, then, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44608879493 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50333908928 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.344628293 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4347826087 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234240626137 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738547830875 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717374918377 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180429895771 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788542689937 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.