Schools should do more to prepare students for non-academic aspects of adulthood.
As we all know, schools are educational institution who educate students academically. There are many levels of schools starting from preschools for toddlers to college for those who wish to continue their education in a specific way after high school. However, there are subjects that are not taught in schools such as taxes, entrepreneur mindset or how to live a simple life happily which I believe these subjects can be very much helpful in every aspects of life. Thus, I strongly agree that educational institution should consider to add some non-academic topics in order to promote healthy adulthood life.
What preschools students get to learn is which color is called purple and how a lion looks like. They also get to spend time with new friends in order to improve their sociality. In this level of education, I believe we can implant children’s concerning good and strong connection between themselves and friends. They should also be taught on how to share and how to give respect to older people because what we teach them at this age will grow stronger. It will be better than wait until they see and imitate bad behavior from other friends or strangers.
It is great that in colleges, we are not limited to learn about our majors are. But we also get to learn some interesting topics as alternative subjects. Nevertheless, schools can also additionally educate students on what they will encounter as an American such as their responsibilities. For instance, taxes and military. It would possibly be much more easier when they maturely grow as an adult by having and understanding all knowledge about what they have to be responsible for in their adulthood.
People live in a different geography and encounter different circumstances. Nonetheless, nurturing their mindset potential can be greatly helpful. Once they start strengthening their mindset, they will understand how to look at aspects of life. They will be able to choose the life they want. They will comprehend many more subjects in life and they will eventually realize that they can achieve anything in life including the most difficult question in Calculus by using this non-academic which calls mindset.
In summarize, adding non-academic aspects lessons in curriculum can enormously benefit students’ future. It is obviously true that education is one of the most important factors in order to succeed in life, but students will plausibly gain benefit from learning about taxes and mindset at an early age. They might be able to uplift their lives in a higher level than our ancestors have ever done.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-14 | muthuakilan | 66 | view |
2019-12-24 | lshopeful | 62 | view |
2019-12-12 | gvnix | 66 | view |
2019-12-07 | Chiragzeel | 70 | view |
2019-12-01 | niksact101 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...se who wish to continue their education in a specific way after high school. However, there are s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider adding'.
Suggestion: consider adding
...ree that educational institution should consider to add some non-academic topics in order to pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...and military. It would possibly be much more easier when they maturely grow as an adult by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, then, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11737089202 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86044591066 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525821596244 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8969953163 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0909090909 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178036867357 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526776695745 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591564288546 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109434434565 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689858809997 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.