Nowadays people always throw old things away, what causes this problem? What effects does the phenomenon lead to? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, more and more people tend to throw away old things leading to devastating effects on the environment. There are some main reasons for this tendency and will be discussed in the following essay along with its effects.
At the heart of the matter is the increasing development of technologies which help to introduce a rapidly enormous number of new products into the market. In fact, citizens do not need to maintain old things anymore when they can straightforward purchase new things at affordable prices.
Furthermore, the fast pace of life is one of the main reasons for throwing away broken things. For example, a broken television would take the owner a lot of time to repair and having a potential risk of repeat errors. While this owner can easily buy a new one to replace in one minute. It is obvious that, in modern life, people do not tend to spend time on fixing things, instead of throwing useless things away and replacing with new ones is the ultimate options individuals’ habit.
However, this tendency has engendered a lot of problems in terms of environment and finance. First, it is manifest that governments have to allocate more funds in waste disposal which come from increasing residents ‘garbage. Those funds can be used for other social purposes such as improve health fare system, erecting new hospitals or schools and so on, thus enhance the quality of human life. Another important effect is the environmental degradation which results from the process of destroying old mental equipment. For instance, the process of laptop disposal could leak some of the toxic chemicals which obtained in laptop’s accessories into the natural environment and contaminate animals and people living around.
In conclusion, the boom of development of technology and fast lifestyle are two primary reasons for the habit of throwing old things away and lead to profoundly negative impacts on society and environment as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | Spring2019 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museumsbetween June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 67
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them.Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given specialtreatment. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 67
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Many countries invest money to prepare competitors to join top competitions like the Olympic Game and the World Cup. It is necessary to offer money to encourage children to exercise. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ving a potential risk of repeat errors. While this owner can easily buy a new one to ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 582, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e process of laptop disposal could leak some of the toxic chemicals which obtained in lapto...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15264797508 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88958904808 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0326978711 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18714649542 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657979952075 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513241790471 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111142607094 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502892038501 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.