The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005.
The figure elucidates the several different crimes in two of the United Kingdom Nations between 1970 and 2005. At first glance, It is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the number of crimes for car theft in comparison with other indicators and it is measured in million.
To begin with, there was a dramatic upsurge for the number of car theft’s crimes in the following 25 years where it, initially, stood at two-fifths and peaked to 16 of 10 in 1995. Erratically, it plummeted tremendously, dropping to ten-tenths by the end of the period shown. Following the same pattern as car theft, the number of house burgling’s crimes, in the first 10 years, jumped enormously to 0.6, nevertheless, it palpitated gradually from 1980, which made up at three-fifth, through to 2005, which constituted approximately for just above four-tenths.
In contrast, the amount of street robbery’s crimes remained stable between 1970 and 1995. Afterwards, it climbed sharply to two-tenths in 2000, and it remained unchanged in the next 5 years.
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 89
- the graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012. 73
- Housing and accommodation has become a major problem in many countries around the world.- What are some of the main factors that have contributed to this problem?- What can be done to help reducing the number of homeless people? 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
The figure elucidates the several different crimes in two of the United Kingdom Nat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... other indicators and it is measured in million. To begin with, there was a dramatic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11451688885 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2233559995 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131710191188 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651942367937 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736836569702 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946068114019 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443760134552 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.