Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (such as the environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that there are different views about how government’s fund should be allocated. While many people suppose that authorities should spend the budget on better public transports, I would argue that it is better to expenditure money on other categories such as economy, health, education.
On the one hand, developing a faster means of public transport would bring a lot of benefits in some extents. Firstly, using public transportations can be a way for people to save the environment. When public transports can fulfill customers’ demands for high quality condition and fast, punctual and friendly service, people will be more motivated to use them as a vehicle to commute to work. As a result, it could possible reduce air pollution which is caused by emission from means of transport. Secondly, taking public transports could be more economical and safe. When more people commute underground or share the space in a bus, public transports would help reduce traffic congestions and fatal accidents. In addition, tickets cost much less than the fuel they need for their private as people could save a great deal of money for other important things.
On the other hand, I believe that spending money on the other sectors such as: economic, health and education would be much more necessary because of some main reasons. The first reason is that developing economic could create jobs, cope with social problems and enhance the quality of standard life for people. When economic growths, people would have countless opportunities to access technology in the world which could apply to improve transport systems, construction methods and management… Further more one reason is that by expending money on health and education system could ensure a quality human resource which meet the demand of the international integration in the future. In addition, health and education also are two key factors to guarantee sustainable development of a country.
In conclusion, although both expenditure budget on better means of public transport or on developing economic, health/ education system are advantageous in their own ways, it seems to me that it is better to take opportunities for other vital fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | thaomeo812 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28169014085 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91338155839 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540845070423 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9261817101 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269523271148 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969056795824 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622586660756 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171654560896 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580554009586 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.