The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
The line graph illustrates that number of passengers use the underground train for their work or travel in London .
Overall, it is clear that the trend which shows the number of passengers Fluctuated with irregular intervals. People use underground station from where they go to office and leaving their office.
As the graph shows, at the 6:00 am, number of passengers account for exactly 100, by following next hour, the number is double. Then, there is drastic increase in number of visitors to 400 untill 8am. Before experiencing a decrease to under 200 visitor at 10 am . Afterwards, the number of visitors rise gradually during next 4 hours and stand at exactly 300 people at underground station.
Moreover, Following two hours, the trend about visitors number tends to down to merely 100 visitors. After declining the number of commuters who travel through underground trains, it witness a significant increase from 100 to under 400 dwellers then it reaches at middle of 100 and 150 commuters .Then, the trend of number of passengers downward throughout the end of day and end up with nearly 150 travellers visit the underground station .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- Today, more school leavers are unable to find jobs. Discuss the causes of rising unemployment among young adults and suggest solutions 11
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. 78
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012. 84
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...train for their work or travel in London . Overall, it is clear that the trend ...
^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n number of visitors to 400 untill 8am. Before experiencing a decrease to under 200 vi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'visitor' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'visitors'.
Suggestion: visitors
...re experiencing a decrease to under 200 visitor at 10 am . Afterwards, the number of vi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...a decrease to under 200 visitor at 10 am . Afterwards, the number of visitors rise...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'witnesses'?
Suggestion: witnesses
...o travel through underground trains, it witness a significant increase from 100 to unde...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...aches at middle of 100 and 150 commuters .Then, the trend of number of passengers ...
^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...hes at middle of 100 and 150 commuters .Then, the trend of number of passengers down...
^^^^
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...travellers visit the underground station .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12169312169 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73067706297 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.5825036286 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402246585602 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155344626925 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102656679324 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257759742967 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684389886953 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.