The table below shows the social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United nations statistics.
The given table indicates the data regarding four indicators of economic and social conditions in four countries, namely Canada, Japan, Peru and Zaire during the period of 1994.
According to the table, the amount of money on annual income per person was overwhelmingly greater in Canada and Japan being $11100 and $15760 respectively while this figure accounted for $160 in Peru and $130 in Zaire. Furthermore, annual life expectancy rate presented the highest data in Japan with 78, this followed by Canada 76; Peru 51; Zaire 47.
By contrast, the amount of calories per person consumed by Canadians and Japanese were 3326 and 2846 calories respectively. Whereas, there was 1749 in Zaire while it was 1927 in Peru. Literacy rates among people, too, higher in wealth notions, Canada and Japan reported the same rate with 99%, meanwhile, Peru has 68% and the least literacy indicators was in Zaire showing 34%.
Overall, each indicator was higher among more economically developed countries compared to poorer ones, according to United Nations statistics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | SandraWolfie | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | saeed2751366 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | narsindi | 84 | view |
- The chart below shoe the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of Japanese tourist market 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 78
- The chart shows the proportion of graduates from Bluesky University in 2006 entering different employer sectors. 56
- people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re 3326 and 2846 calories respectively. Whereas, there was 1749 in Zaire while it was 1...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aire while it was 1927 in Peru. Literacy rates among people, too, higher in wealt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63714208931 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4367462834 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228500480093 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989188564849 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123994592791 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164350863098 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127338292864 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.