As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?
To what extend do you agree or disagree
There is a robust argument that computers can efficiently and precisely do language conversions; thus, mastering overseas language is no longer required with this advancement. I completely disagree with the notion. This essay will deeply analyze the argument and render the best verdict out of it.
Firstly, overseas languages broaden a person’s horizon because language represents the culture of a country. Traveling has remarkably increased these days and daily people are encountered with wide range of languages. Hence, language barrier refrains a person from indulging into a specific culture. A succinate example proclaiming this; In Germany, people around tend to feel home sick due to constraint put up by language of a country resulting in boredom rather than enjoyment. However, without the knowledge of a local language one cannot expand his social circle and here, role of computer for language culled in the real world.
Secondly, knowledge of foreign languages is imperative in multiple businesses. These-days trade has no boundaries as expanding the world over, hence to compete with the international business, being multilingual is of utmost importance for an effective customer and company relationship. For illustration, in Pakistan, thousands of foreigners pay visit to tourist places every year, which requires spontaneous verbal skills and it completely extirpate the efficiency of computers. In other words, for communication in business, there is no room for translation and individuals must have proficiency in language in order to guide and explain properly.
To conclude, this essay argued why considering foreign linguistics is a waste of time is completely preposterous, while in actual it is investment of time because it results in gaining enormous experience and it flourish business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Aroraprerna | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | khan0229 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | khan0229 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- You are about to start social meetings in a particular area where people from different nationalities can take part. Write a letter to the editor of a local newspaper requesting him to publish information about this:-- What activities you have planned- Wh 89
- Some say that music, art, and drama are as important as other school subjects, especiallyat the primary level.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings This money should be spent on building modern buildings instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for language culled in the real world. Secondly, knowledge of foreign languages...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extirpates'?
Suggestion: extirpates
...taneous verbal skills and it completely extirpate the efficiency of computers. In other w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'flourishes'?
Suggestion: flourishes
...s in gaining enormous experience and it flourish business.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66545454545 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13173888275 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8864747187 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175984299627 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586996212283 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440159771367 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101247233437 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163690672214 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.