As computers translate quickly and acurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?
To what extend do you agree or disagree.
it is argued that learning a foreign language is worthless as the technology could be used to do this, which can perform translations rapidly and precisely. this essay completely disagrees with the statement because mastering in linguistics is completely a different entity and improves knowledge and also it's hard to carry a computer or a translator technology where ever necessary.
To embark on, while a computer could necessarily translate the speech or language, we as humans need to feed the data into it to make it understand what a foreign language is. The translation of only single words or sentences won't help in real-life when we need a foreigner to understand what we want to convey. For this to work smoothly a translator is mandatory and must have a great knowledge of which language he had to transpose. For example, remote areas where computer access is almost impossible a human translator can make people understand about discussions.
Although, for learning a foreign language we could seek help from a computer to know the meanings of sentences we couldn't possibly rely completely on them for efficient translation. Along with this, learning a foreign language could improve intellectuality and emphasizes the way we interact with an outsider and understand the heritage of a country to the core this enables us to cross the language barriers and create wonders and opens the ocean of possibilities from business deals to financial aids and you name it everything we could gain. For instance, a recent study on languages reported that a person who has knowledge of 3 or more linguistics has more intelligent quotient that those who don't have any.
In conclusion, anything we can learn does not mean it's a waste of time rather it is the wise use of it when we learn new things, despite the capabilities of the computer of translation they have their own limitations which are unlikely to humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Aroraprerna | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | khan0229 | 89 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Agree or disagree? 89
- Many schools these days have problems with poor student behavior. Why do you think these problems occur? What could be done tackle these problems? 84
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well.What problems will your country face in the next ten years?How can these problems be overcome?Give reasons for your 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the artsand that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- Nowadays young people have to make the decisions about their future career Some people however believe that teachers and parents can make a better choice for their future career Discuss both options and include your opinion with relevant examples from you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that learning a foreign langu...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...orm translations rapidly and precisely. this essay completely disagrees with the sta...
^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...er to know the meanings of sentences we couldnt possibly rely completely on them for ef...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 699, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ore intelligent quotient that those who dont have any. In conclusion, anything...
^^^^
Line 13, column 52, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...on, anything we can learn does not mean its a waste of time rather it is the wise u...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04375 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9711355547 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4865680261 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.4 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250645387919 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10409715108 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493371996792 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153572461551 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016714279401 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.