A controversial debate which is raised about the role of modern transportation in our lives. Some people hold the view that modern transportation encourages people to own more cars and increase traffic on the roads. However, some others may have an opposing view and feel that modern technology and shipping helps to create a cleaner environment. From my vantage view, I concur with the later groups and feel that modern transportation has made the world a better place because of a cleaner environment and saving of fuel consumption.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that modern transportation has made the world a better place because it saves the environment. Many electrical cars are available in the market which does not need fuel to operate. These vehicles do not release carbon dioxide into the air. Thus, they do not harm the environment. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is the creation of Tesla car. Those cars are called zero emission cars, which means that they do not release carbon dioxide and causes the green gas effect. They are environment-friendly cars that keep the air clean.
The second point which is worth some words here is that modern transportation does need fuel to operate. These cars can save us money. A car can be plugged into electricity the whole night and be ready to be driven the next day. Saving fuel cost can save us lots of money. For instance, a regular car needs to be filled with 4 gallons of fuel to cross 200 miles. The four gallons cost around $20. However, with electricity operated vehicles, we can save this money and at the same time save the environment.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. There is another subtle point to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Amecian car magazine Journal. The study shows that governments are significantly encouraging people to own these cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allows people to save money and the possibility of driving those cars on the pool lane which can also save time commuting.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned points, one soon realizes the importance of modern transportation technology in our lives. Such technology has saved the environment and saves us money because of the fuel savings.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 75
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 60
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 83
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ronment and saving of fuel consumption. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 383, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... own these cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94376528117 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89307459635 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493887530562 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2372961318 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.88 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.36 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178308717726 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050681270195 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102442273705 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111305121489 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114012429235 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.