The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart given provides information about the proportion of separation in Finland and Sweden over the course 4 years from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that Sweden experiences a downward trend, whereas the figure for Finland shows an increase throughout the period.
In 2011, regarding Sweden’s divorce, its rate was about 45%, is higher than the percentage of Finland, by 7%. Subsequently, this number saw significant growth, with the figure reached a peak in 2012, about 49%. However, the figure gradually declines in 2013, about 47%, and continued to fall steadily to the end of the period, reaching around 45% in 2014 and hitting a low-point in 2015, approximately 37%.
As for the breaking up marriages in Finland, this number less than in 2011, just only 38% and it showed a considerable drop to the lowest in the next year, just about 32%. Nevertheless, the figure showed growth moderately before remaining steady between 2013 and 2015, from 39% to 42%, outpacing the rate of Sweden.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 75
- THE PIE CHARTS BELOW SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF FIVE KINDS OF BOOKS SOLD BY A BOOKSELLER BETWEEN 1972 AND 2012 70
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia Australia in 2010. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 word 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01162790698 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73201380031 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656976744186 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0231203425 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145297376047 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721715331503 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617652301777 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102218479628 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612732294939 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.