There is a controversial debate which is raised about the effect of technological devices on children's education. Some groups of parents hold the view that new devices do not affect children's education. However, Other groups of parents h may have an opposing view and believe that such devices cause distraction and educational difficulties. From my vantage point, I am more inclined with the letter groups for a variety of reason.
First, a new technological device causes children to waste a lot of time. Typically, children spend one to two hours a day playing computer games, however, there are some other instances where children spend more than four hours playing. This extended period of playing may cause several problems for children. Initially, they may lose concentration abilities, and then find difficulties in falling asleep, and be more aggressive. A compelling example of this is the change in my cousin's behavior. He arrives from school at three o'clock, he does not start studying before six. Hopelessly does his parents refrain him from playing, but in vain. Therefore, cellphones and computer may cause real difficulties for parents to educate their children properly.
Secondly, new technological devices disrupt communication between family members. Children, nowadays, are so much attached to their cellphones that they no more communicate effectively with their parents. In the past, children were talking to each other while they were eating, drinking, or watching television. However, nowadays, parents find difficulties communicating with their children because most of the time they are online chatting instead of studying. Therefore, new technological devices have not only affected education but also the way children communicate with their parents and with each other.
Although the aforementioned reason is the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no mean the only reason available. In fact, these a further subtle reason, which is a study that was published in the children academic journal. The study was conducted on one hundred and twenty students in the 5th grade where students were tested for the effect of cellphone on their concentration abilities. Astonishingly, the study shows that students who use cellphone were less able to concentrate, Furthermore, their quality of sleep was worsened. Thus, in conclusion, this study makes us conclude that computers not only cause children to be distracted from learning but also have more difficulties falling asleep.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that although cell phones and technological devices help children to communicate, they might have a devastating effect on the quality of life of children
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than their friends. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person's childhood years (the time from birth to twelve years of age) are the most important years of a person's life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. 73
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the danger of glass on birds. While the reading state that there are many solutions to prevent injuries to birds. The lecture refutes this, by saying that these solutions not effective to prevent birds fro 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
...havior. He arrives from school at three oclock, he does not start studying before six....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45774647887 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0069506277 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528169014085 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2560303243 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.086956522 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5217391304 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196899613708 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054766296758 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047478548828 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10792744259 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399803828176 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.