The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It includes those with a degree, those with higher degree (post graduate) and those with other qualifications. Summarize the information and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph provides information about the full time earnings of people of different ages from 21 to 60 years old per week based on educational degrees in 2002.
An overall view indicates that the weekly income of people aged between, 21 to 40 has risen dramatically in all of groups include higher degree, first degree and others. After that the earning of others group decreased significantly whilst the first degree experienced almost a steady trend and higher degree group faced deeply rise after around age of 55.
The others group salary starts from a bit more than 400 pounds in the first age period which is 21-25, and has reached to about 800 pounds between 36-40 ages. As a fact, 800 pounds per week is the maximum income that belongs to this group as wel. Although, the others group earnings trend suddenly declined between 36-40 and this trend continued to the end. While the trend of higher degree after a grow fairly well at the beginning, faced a slight decrease an ages 41-51 but again change to upward trend with a sharp rate in the 51-55 ages. The first degree trend is very similar to higher degree trend with a slower rate and of course lower salary in all of age's period than two other groups. It can be mentioned same salary of others and first degree groups at the end of graph, as an interesting point.
Taking everything into consideration, the earnings of all groups almost have been increased as age grows in general view. Although it is clear that the maximum earnings were seen at the middle of ages which is 36-45.
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It includes those with a degree, those with higher degree (post graduate) and those with other qualifications. Summarize the information and reporting the main features, and m 56
- asking about a course to help improve your memory 56
- The graph shows the amount earned by graduates of different age groups in 2002. It includes those with a degree, those with higher degree (post graduate) and those with other qualifications. Summarize the information and reporting the main features, and m 56
- some people believe that university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their own courses and the government should not be expected to find higher education to what extent do you agree 78
- asking about a course to help improve your memory 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...en graph provides information about the full time earnings of people of different ages fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k based on educational degrees in 2002. An overall view indicates that the weekl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... While the trend of higher degree after a grow fairly well at the beginning, faced a s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an age' or simply 'ages'?
Suggestion: an age; ages
... the beginning, faced a slight decrease an ages 41-51 but again change to upward trend ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...increased as age grows in general view. Although it is clear that the maximum earnings w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, well, while, in general, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67272727273 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27769348318 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2115441345 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212385556508 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872795755431 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392814132403 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131802781176 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335019398175 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.