The percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions
The line graph given illustrates the data about the number of visitors who went to four tourist attractions, namely Aquarium, the Castle, Zoo, the Festival in Edinburgh over the course 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the rate of visitors to the zoo and the castle was witnessed an upward trend whereas the number of this came to other places declined over the period.
In 1980, the festival was the most favourite attraction, about 30% compared with the rate of visitors came to the castle and aquarium were less popular, 23% and 20% respectively. With 10% for the zoo, was the least interesting with tourists.
During the early 20 years, there was a rapid growth in tourists to the castle from 25% to 45% and then it dropped considerably to 30% in 2010. This was the same trend for the aquarium. Visitors significantly increased to 35% in 1985. Then it fell gradually to under 10% after rising slightly in 1995, about 23%. Furthermore, the figure of travellers who came to the festival fluctuated slightly but in general remained stable, about 25%. In addition, the visitors to the zoo oscillated moderately between 1980 and 2000 before rising gradually to 20% in 2010.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below. 73
- The pie graph below shows the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 73
- THE GRAPH BELOW THE CONTRIBUTION OF THREE SECTORS - AGRICULTURE, MANUFACTURING, AND BUSINESSES AND FINANCIAL SERVICES - TO THE UK ECONOMY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the least interesting with tourists. During the early 20 years, there was a r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, whereas, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88613861386 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61455511346 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1057165819 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0488283226972 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187535208258 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297249168478 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0319030918917 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034550140499 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.