The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000.
The figure elucidates the number of internet utilisation in Taiwan by age group between 1998 and 2000. At the first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the internet use of people around 16 to 30 years old.
To begin with, there was a remarkable drop in the percentage of internet usage for 16 to 30 days from 1998, which made up at 53%, through to 2000, which constituted at well below a half. Following the same pattern as 16 to 30 years’ category, the amount of internet utilisation of people about 31 to 50 years old plummeted gradually where it stood at just above two-fifths in 1998 and achieved to well over three-tenths in the 2000.
In contrast, 1998 to 2000 witnessed a significant upsurge for the people who are approximately less than 15 years old for using internet. It, initially, upright positioned at 2% and it climbed considerably, soaring to 9 of 100 by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 73
- Individual greed and selfishness has been the basis of the modern society. Some people think that we must return to the older and more traditional values of respect for the family and the local community in order to create a better world to live in. To wh 73
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. Why are these changes happening? Do you think these changes are positive and negative? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68072289157 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82051898299 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632530120482 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6400935625 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25351364752 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140824657029 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140708500837 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179779024677 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777405531924 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.