The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok.
The bar chart given illustrates the information about the proportion of people visited various tourist attractions in Thailand, namely Bangkok Zoo, Sea World, Wax Museum, China Town over the course of 3 years, from 2014 to 2017.
In general, the rate of tourists to the Wax Museum saw an upward trend whereas the other figures had an opposite trend over the same period.
Regarding the Sea world, it was the most favourite location in 2014, about 70% of the number of visitors, was higher than the rate of Bangkok Zoo, around 50%. Over the next three years, the number of the Sea world was double fluctuation in comparison with the Bangkok Zoo. About 20%, 25% and 5% with the Sea world, around 45%, 50% and 20% with the Bangkok Zoo.
As for all tourists, China Town was the least popular place in 2014, just under 20%, it was lower than the Wax museum, approximately 45% of the total amount. Over the next two years, the increasing trend in the number of travellers to both Wax Museum and China Town was similar. Furthermore, the rate of China Town experienced a record high in 2016, at 100 %. Nevertheless, there was a significant decline in China Town, from 80% to 70%while the Wax Museum fell slightly, from 100% to 10% in 2017
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 word 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 75
- The pie graph below shows the results of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate. 73
- the are the advantages and disadvantages of taking English lessons with classmates form the same country 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64840182648 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42667680802 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7987535995 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.111111111 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898311254298 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407524149309 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693516478994 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768381545085 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908134491444 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.