An increase in production of consumer goods result in damage of the natural environment . What are the reasons and possible solutions.
Goods are imperative for fulfilling the needs of the consumer in some form or other, thereby companies are producing goods at an excessive rate, which in turn indirectly have an impact on the natural environment. Hence, here I am going to highlight some possible reasons as well as measures which can be taken to overcome such development.
To begin with, fierce competition among companies to fulfill all needs of the consumer has made them oblivious of the dilapidation, which is occurring on the environment. There are manifold reasons which has brought this inclination in consumer goods. Firstly, burgeoning population has many needs and thereby made companies to escalate production of goods. As a result, exponential damage is transpiring on environment, because companies use natural resources with an alarming rate to produce goods, thus resulting in depletion of resources. Secondly, people now prefer modular design of products, which is again the major cause of more goods production. For instance, it has been found in many surveys that many countries are facing problems of pollution, and similar related problem due to intense use of resources by companies.
However, any problem can be curtailed with effective initiatives. Firstly, the government can play a significant role by enforcing stringent laws against those companies, which are misusing resources for producing goods, consequently companies will be under supervision of government, and will never cross their boundaries. On the top of that, people should be aware and responsible related to use of goods, and try to refrain themselves in buying unnecessary goods, which may later prove beneficial to them in terms of financial saving and so on. Furthermore, there should be recycling of goods so that natural resources could be preserved.
In conclusion, I opine goods are essential parts of daily life, but good's production should be done by keeping all essential things into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | lovy | 61 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 95
- In many countries, the rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming poorer.Why is this problem?What solutions are there to tackle this problem? 100
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives. What are the reasons for this? How can this problem be overcome? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... which is again the major cause of more goods production. For instance, it has been f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'initiative'?
Suggestion: initiative
... problem can overcome with an effective initiatives. On the top that, the government can pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing and so on. Furthermore, there should recycling of goods so that natural resou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46534653465 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99288441505 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6045018409 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7142857143 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194409072563 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065733060792 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592676691312 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117122524299 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609962201692 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.