New stories on TV and in Newspapers are often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is you opinion about this?
News representation has been changing drastically in accordance to the competition in the news industry. Nowadays, news stories on televisions or in newspapers are generally contains visuals. Due to this, several people anticipate that these photos are the ultimate way to showcase the news effectively. What could be the appropriate idea of providing news? A thorough scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one side other the other, I prefer to present a balanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, visuals definitely make impact on shaping up the viewers opinion in many ways. However, rather than just watching pictures, it is always recommended to read the story behind the scene to obtain credible data. The subsequent two paragraphs will detail the both aspects extensively.
First and foremost, visuals shown on televisions or in news letters are considered as a proof of the incident happened at the any location. These pictures not only give overall understanding of any news but also save time of an over occupied work professional, who does not have time to read complete article thoroughly. For Example, a survey conducted by Mumbai Mirror says that people has started being more interested in reading news because of the inclusion of photos in the news articles.
On the contrary, one must never misinterpret the content of the news by viewing the pictures on TV or in newspapers. Additionally, an individual must read the information before coming to any conclusion about the presented news. In support of the above, there are myriad of fake news rumoured because of misunderstandings of the visuals and by not reading the actual content.
Keeping all the above-mentioned facts in mind, getting sense of any news and being more involved in it by pictures are evident. However, components such as legitimate content and consequences of misinterpreting the visuals are will worthy of equivalent consideration. To conclude, as is most of the things in life, this matter has two sides. Fortunately, in this case, both of them are constructive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | essayevaluation | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | essayevaluation | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | essayevaluation | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | essayevaluation | 84 | view |
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places. How it has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages of relying too much on it. 84
- New stories on TV and in Newspapers are often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is you opinion about this? 84
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the correct place.What is your opinion in this? 89
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. 73
- Some parents believe that child should not waste time by reading entertainment books but instead they should spend time to read educational books only. What is your opinion about this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...efinitely make impact on shaping up the viewers opinion in many ways. However, rather t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended reading'.
Suggestion: recommended reading
...an just watching pictures, it is always recommended to read the story behind the scene to obtain cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21637426901 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1195308833 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5149689482 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8947368421 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142222562214 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404405285374 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356098931903 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733430512994 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139703628937 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.