Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfied job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are controversial views about whether we should accept it or try to improve it when running into a bad situation, such as unsatisfactory employment or lack of money. In this essay, I will examine both sides and give my own opinion.
Accepting the bad situation allows people to get accustomed to it as soon as possible. Once having made up this mind, individuals will focus on how to make a living under an unsatisfying circumstance, rather than wasting time to make complaints or risking more of their affluence for a change. This additionally helps them to avoid losing more. For example, those who lack money might make every effort to diminish their daily consumption instead of pouring more savings to seek for potential investment.
However, there are several good reasons why people should spare no effort to try to improve a bad situation. First, their desires for better conditions provide individuals with strong motivation to work harder and make progress, which is beneficial for their future career. For instance, employees who are not satisfied with their work environments or salaries might make arduous effort to elevate their professional competence, and may finally achieve the opportunities to ask for better welfares. Second, the process of attempting improvements encourages people to grab opportunities initiatively for better development, therefore making them more likely to succeed.
Personally, I suggest that people should struggle to improve the bad circumstance rather than accept it, since negative acceptance hinders them from making changes as well as seeking for a more promising future. In a fiercely competitive society, only by improvements can we live a satisfying life in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36996336996 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00260858827 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5436778075 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18463781619 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075257704298 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674676262517 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132903926937 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090361065424 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.