The table chart and pie chart give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to us between 1988 and 2000.
The table chart illustrate the total earning from import fish to us between 1988 & 2000 while pie chart depicts that different sources from where fishes are imported to us at same time.
It is clear that, sales of fish during the period from 1988 to 2000 increased. While Canada was major source of fish imported in 1988, for it stood at least position in 2000. Remaining two source, sale rose gradually throughout the period.
As the table graph shows, annual income from fish import represented at 6.57 billion of dollars. Afterwards, it increased by 2 billion of dollars in 1992. By following survey in 2000, 10.72 billion of dollars had been acquire from only one source import fishes.
From the pic graph, In terms of Canada, the figure for exporting fish in 1988 accounted for about 60% which was the highest throughout the period. Afterwards it experienced a decrease to 34% in 1992 and 28% in 2000. As well as it stood at the lowest position among all sources. Furthermore, only 13% fish had been sold in 1988 from China compared to 27% from other. But in next four years, both categories witness an rise to 20% from China and 46% from other respectively. In addition, The proportion of fish exported from China represented at 30% and from other countries, fish had been sold only at 42% in 2000.
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualifications in 2007 8 and 2008 9 and the proportion of male qualifiers 57
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems.Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems? 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ales of fish during the period from 1988 to 2000 increased. While Canada was majo...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'source' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sources'.
Suggestion: sources
...t least position in 2000. Remaining two source, sale rose gradually throughout the per...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l income from fish import represented at 6.57 billion of dollars. Afterwards, it ...
^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1992. By following survey in 2000, 10.72 billion of dollars had been acquire from...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acquired'.
Suggestion: acquired
...000, 10.72 billion of dollars had been acquire from only one source import fishes. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sold in 1988 from China compared to 27% from other. But in next four years, both...
^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ext four years, both categories witness an rise to 20% from China and 46% from oth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, at least, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73362445415 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44553526291 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572052401747 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5126224426 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3846153846 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286916861114 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101327682581 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133209220541 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225837624217 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172808170812 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.