1. Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author claims that the indicator of teachers’ salaries should be the pupils’ performance in the lessons. This is the assertation with which I totally do not concur. Among the countless rearing reason, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to verify my standpoint.
The first crucial reason which should be highlighted is students’ scholar proficiency is not merely depended on the teachers. Indeed, various factors such as the learning equipment of school, students’ intelligence level, or even the dominant atmosphere in the house possess an undeniable effect on the presented performance by the students. If from mentioned factors, the learning equipment of school is considered for further explanation; the biology lab can be a decent example to clarify the striking impact of this factor over the learning performance of students. For instance, if a high school is lacking the well- equipped biology laboratory, the students will not able to observe the onion cells and its cell divisions; in this scenario, all effort of teachers for a theoretical explanation of this phenomenon is a dead-ended affair. This example lucidly illustrates the importance of the other factors over the students presented performance which are beyond the teachers’ responsibility.
Another equal crux reason which should be bolded is the weakness of the benchmark used for evaluation of students’ performance. In general touchstone for the students’ academic proficiency is the examination system which owns a list of failures to present the exact status of the students’ knowledge level. The first failure which can be mentioned is its short period, it is obvious that the content of the entire semester cannot be held in an hour test; therefore, the presented performance in the test is only a small portion of the students’ understanding; and either their success nor their failure in the exam is not real representor of their real level. Another shortage of the examination system is its stressful atmosphere which completely manipulated the students’ performance. According to the noteworthy intelligence research conducted by the Psychology Department of the Tehran University, the elementary students’ stress on their test day in Tehran leads to thirty-five percent reduction of their ultimate performance in the test. Therefore, the shortage of testing system for covering the exact understanding of the students can also lead to failure in academic performance which is out of the teachers’ control.
Finally, the discussed contents in the various fields are not the same which shows it is not a fair decision to merely emphasize the students’ performance. In another word, the content of lesson such as art completely differs from mathematics. In this case, the effort presented by the mathematics teacher varies from the art teacher too. Furthermore, according to the content’s easiness level, the student’s performance is varied in these fields too. Therefore, it is not a wise idea to considered only the student academic performance to define the amount of income for each teacher.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict the consideration of only students’ performance for the determination of teachers’ salaries is not a fair and decent option.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
2019-09-14 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would he more satisfying. 70
- 1 83
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five best selling cheeses at our newest store were domestic cheddar cheeses from Wisconsin Furthermore a recent surve 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2875.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56092843327 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39482935406 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462282398453 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2822168119 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.75 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.85 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195381287771 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766661037095 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485761061286 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118696565662 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045194526795 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.