The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make
comparisons where relevant
A glance at the table reveals clear differences between the major underground systems of the world in terms of ages, scale and carrying capacity.
One interesting fact highlighted by the statistics supplied is that the more recently constructed metro systems were far shorter than the older ones.
Completed in 1863, the LD underground is the oldest compared to other systems listed, and also the longest, extending for 1100 km. Likewise, the second oldest is also the second longest – the Paris metro, built seven years later, is 549 km long. Third and fourth in terms of the total length were the Tokyo and WDC subway, which did not come in use not until 1904 and 1921, spreading less than 150 km. Approximately one-tenth of that, 11 km was the length of the Kyoto MRT system, in the late 20th century.
With regard to the annual carrying volume, the metro system mentioned vary greatly. Transporting 1434 million passengers per year, the Tokyo subway’s capacity is highest, one hundred times more than that of Kyoto subway, which has the smallest capacity, only 11 million. Came as second in terms of the capacity, meanwhile, is the Paris underground, conveying 850 million travelers every year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Diem Hang 1612 | 78 | view |
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The diagram below shows the process of collecting rain water for use in an Australian town. 89
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opini 84
- Some people think all lawbreakers should be put into prison, while others believethat there are better alternatives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, second, so, third, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02487562189 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6040107067 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8700890896 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104066122774 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046330431991 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431480439095 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074541079518 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371615154708 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.