The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph illustrates the amount of fish, beef, chicken and lamp consumed in a particular European country over the course of 25 years starting from 1979.
An overview is that the weekly consumption of chicken per person had an upward trend while the reverse was true for fish and other kind of meat. And fish was the least favorite food during this period.
In the beginning year, beef was by far the most popular of these food, at 220 gram which was one and a half that of chicken. After some fluctuations until 1989, the consumption of beef witnessed a gradual decrease to just over 100 gram in 2004. However, there was a significant rise in the figure for chicken eaten during the time given, which finally peaked at approximately 250 gram, becoming dominant food.
Meanwhile, in 1979, the amount of lamb eaten was 150 gram, doubling the statistic of fish. Nevertheless, the consumption of lamb dropped by 100 gram to about 70 gram, while there was a stability in the figure for fish, which ended at 40 gram in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 73
- With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should lookfor sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do theadvantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 89
- the charts below show the distribution of employment in agriculture, industry and services in three countries in 1980 and a prediction to 2020. 84
- Some people hold that we should spend amount of time and money on the protection of wild animals Some people argue that they should be spent on human populations To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ar, beef was by far the most popular of these food, at 220 gram which was one and a half t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... the most popular of these food, at 220 gram which was one and a half that of chicke...
^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...sed a gradual decrease to just over 100 gram in 2004. However, there was a significa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ich finally peaked at approximately 250 gram, becoming dominant food. Meanwhile, in...
^^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... 1979, the amount of lamb eaten was 150 gram, doubling the statistic of fish. Nevert...
^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... the consumption of lamb dropped by 100 gram to about 70 gram, while there was a sta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...of lamb dropped by 100 gram to about 70 gram, while there was a stability in the fig...
^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... the figure for fish, which ended at 40 gram in 2004.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66483516484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48604971455 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6876641853 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.125 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141823799932 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695263973359 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033333474545 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960319301645 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294691858579 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.