The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand
and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie graphs compare electricity production by five different fuels in New Zealand and Germany between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, while the electricity, in Germany, is mainly generated by nuclear power, the most popular source was coal in New Zealand. Besides, the total unit's creation increased in both countries throughout 30 years.
In New Zealand, the total generation rose quickly from 127 units (1980) to 200 units (2010). During this time, the number of coal dramatically increased from 56 to 150 units, which accounted for nearly three-fourths of electricity creation. While the number of hydro stayed the same proportion (nearly 25%), the figure of natural gas and petroleum dropped rapidly from 30 units and 11 units (1980) to 2 units (2010), respectively.
In Germany, the number of nuclear, which did not have in New Zealand, grew significantly from 20 units (1980) to 155 units (2010). The numbers of coal, petroleum, natural gas, hydro decreased from 28,22,28 and 7 units (1980) to combined figure which was less than nearly three times the figure of nuclear (2010). Besides, the total production climbed double to 214 units (2010).
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- Many university students live with their families, while others live awayfrom home because their universities are in different places. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of both situations? 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key toreducing traffic accidents. Others, however,believe that other measures would bemore effective in improving road safety.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'units'' or 'unit's'?
Suggestion: units'; unit's
...coal in New Zealand. Besides, the total units creation increased in both countries th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ction climbed double to 214 units 2010.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14054054054 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63135001888 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9656385506 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14127640404 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747225446244 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605426044148 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114349518477 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052232704286 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.