It is argued that humanitarian aid should be given to developing countries during natural catastrophe by developed countries. Due to drastic change in climate, the frequency of natural disasters like earthquake, cyclones, tsunami etc. increased. Developed countries can support other countries which are poor by providing financial support as well as help in implementing awareness programs for disaster recovery. This write up endeavors to highlight that rich nation help can result in faster and easy recovery from the catastrophes in the under developed countries.
Foremost, the rich countries can support in reducing the poverty by giving financial aids which will help in saving life in addition to facilitate the population with basic necessities of living i.e. food, cloth and shelter. In the affected areas, helicopter assistance and rescue operation implementation will be faster if concerned department has proper funds to spend. For instance, in the year 2018, Gulf countries helped Indian government by providing financial aids for the recovery of Kerala state which was fully destroyed by cyclone and floods.
Secondly, rich nations have strong disaster recovery plans which can be easily implemented in all high risk areas of nation. These programs help in reducing the economic loss at the time of calamities as we all save many lives’. The irony is that those countries that have contributed least to climate change, are the ones that are being hit the hardest in terms of loss of life from disasters. In African nations, UN disaster Recovery department undergo a plan to construct earthquake prone houses for the poor people to live safely.
In conclusion, with the support of high-income countries human life can be saved at the time of natural calamities. The relief funds and proper recovery planning in advance can limit the loss during disasters.
- Environmental problem are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with t 73
- Many people argue that eating junk food has led to an unhealthy lifestyle This problem has become more common among young people these days Do you agree or disagree that junk food is the cause of the issue 56
- Environmental problem are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with t 73
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 78
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ition to facilitate the population with basic necessities of living i.e. food, cloth and shelter....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39322033898 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83126144455 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569491525424 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6406745223 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219883649965 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768465390611 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577284615587 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132342252449 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054903215863 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.