This topic raises the controversial issue of whether scandals are useful or not. Indisputably, scandals do bring lights on the unseen issue and let people focus their attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Thus, I generally agree with the opinion that scandals are useful for focusing attention on problems.
First of all, scandals bound the leaders to step back from doing any more illegal thing. I would like to point out that the scandals make people more aware of the leader and get to know the true color. To illustrate, let us look at the example of West Bengal chief minister where she has been in power for a decade but recent scandals about her carelessness for the state has made the young generation of west Bengal to raise a voice against her. In this circumstances, obviously she has been bound to be more careful about her actions and consequences. Consequently, it is obvious that scandals are useful as they focus our attention on problems.
Furthermore, fair judgement can be made after proper investigation of a scandals. People get to understand what is right and what is wrong. Specifically, when there are a lot of scandals for a single leader, obviously, something has to be wrong with that person in power. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that in such cases either the person reforms or some judgement are being taken to reform the system. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that scandals are useful.
Admittedly, at such huge power levels, scandals can be false too, harming the image of a good leader. This is true especially when there is a bad political rivalry. In addition, scandals does bring attention to the problem but doesn’t really solve the problem unless the person involved is reformed. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that scandals are not useful. Because, unless people are aware of a leader’s true conduct, they will never be able to make fair judgement.
In the conclusion, although scandals sometime does prove unhealthy, most of the times it is a healthy practice to keep a check on the leaders in power. In fact, scandals, as long as they are true, should be taken as a positive reformative both by the judge as well the person being judged.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- 1.Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 63
- On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...Bengal to raise a voice against her. In this circumstances, obviously she has been b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scandal' or simply 'scandals'?
Suggestion: a scandal; scandals
...n be made after proper investigation of a scandals. People get to understand what is right...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, really, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90076335878 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71023544062 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539440203562 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8096579752 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.65 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215405517837 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069086417883 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688119240756 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128497186417 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074769868636 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.