The bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one city in 1950, 1970 and 1990.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart provides the information on the percentages of various ways that people in a city used to travel to and from work in 1950, 1970 and 1990.
As can be seen, the number of travelers using car increased significantly from 1950 to 1990, whereas the commuters by bike and foot kept declining during the period.
There was totally more than 70% of travelers who went to and from work by bike and foot in 1950. However, the figure steeply dropped later. The amount of walker fell to below 25%t in 1970 and just above 10% in 1990. It was almost the same situation for the quantity of bikers.
On the other hand, there was a soar in the number of car users. The figure went up enormously from around 5% in 1950 to over 30% in 1970, and then reached more than 40% in 1990. Meanwhile, the amount of people who traveled by bus fluctuated. It started at around 20% in 1950, jumped to roughly 30% in 1970, but then went down to nearly 20% in 1990.
As a whole, car has rapidly become the most popular mean of transport from 1950 to 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | nicknguyen | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 71
- Differences between countries have become less evident. For example, nowadays the same films, fashions, brands and TV programmes are found worldwide. To what extend do you think the disadvantages of this outweigh its advantages? 73
- The two pie chart show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982 Write a report to describe the information shown in the charts 73
- The graphs below indicate the effect of treatment in two types of cancer in females.Using the information in the graphs, describe and compare the situation with and without treatment for the two types of cancer. 67
- The following table gives the statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar mean of transport from 1950 to 1990.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35204081633 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22539651058 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8842280791 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5454545455 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317439055986 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110151867085 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107191146561 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19444892973 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994502977733 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.