In modern days, unsatisfaction in a profession of many people and low salaries have become serious situations. Although some people think that living with these problems is the best way, The rest of them believe that searching more opportunity to solve these issues is better. In this essay, I will support both sides with examples and represent a conclusion.
One side of the argument, there are people who claim that because nowadays getting more chance to support the quality of their life is so rare, people who do a job with low wage is increasing day by day. As a result, unsatisfactory of profession among workers is also rising. However, if they abandon their work, a chance to improve their job is almost impossible because it is rare that a competitive area in business has a vacancy for unemployment. Generally, it is the best way to acknowledging their situations such as lack of finance.
On the other hand, it is also possible to argue that improving academic skill and degree is an absolutely good way for people trying to escape from many problems related to their poor job because people with high education take more opportunity to get a good job with high salaries such as a doctor, lawyer, and magistrate. One particularly good example is that recent researches have shown that workers with a satisfactory job had high education. So, maybe gaining more knowledge is one of the best methods.
To sum up, as we have seen, this question is uneasy to discuss. However, I think that instead of accepting bad situations, improving knowledge and then interesting other works with high wage is better.
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes being committed each year. While some think that the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed.Discuss the both views. 78
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale with others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, then, i think, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79445495802 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556363636364 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4846248065 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207103182437 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676601736967 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507189211326 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121954934614 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166424279042 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.