In modern days, one of the controversial changes is related to whether garbage from residence recovered is not enough. Some people often say that governments need to intervene in recycling waste by laws requiring. In this essay, I will consider how the garbage affects to environment and then secondly about that declaring a legal requirement associated with a waste need or don't need.
On one side of the argument, there are people who claim that garbage is destroying environments day by day because waste created by human being contains many chemical elements. The primary reason for believing this is that plastic materials or glass bottles that everyone uses dissolve to the soil for a long time. It is also possible to argue that to solve this situation, many types of recycling machines and equipment are being used throughout the world. One important illustration of this is in Germany the supermarkets encourage people by buying plastic or a glass bottle which they afterward could easily put in special recycling machine and hereby get some money from this equipment just only for recycling bottles.
On the other hand, it is argued that in fact last years lot of such issues as air pollution and warming for nature has emerged despite some technical supports. Cause of that, some local counsels declared laws that required that humans must regard safe mode of environment. A particularly good example is that it has a positive effect that in China people who discarded waste in the pubic area is abandoned by monetary fines.
Generally, as we have seen, it is evident that lawful rules need to accelerate recycling waste. I tend to undoubtedly believe that helps of government is fundamental for recovering garbage.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by chienese people between 1985 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...requirement associated to waste need or dont need. On one side of the argument ther...
^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...les need to accelerate recycling waste. i tend to undoubtedly believe that helps ...
^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...les need to accelerate recycling waste. i tend to undoubtedly believe that helps ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, then, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05614035088 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72329078719 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3723980064 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.083333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270362374462 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938441470995 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834010667594 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151401309243 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531102131224 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.