The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?
Indicators Canada Japan Peru Zaire
Annual income per person (in $US) 11100 15760 160 130
Life expectancy at birth 76 78 51 47
Daily calorie supply per person 3326 2846 1927 1749
Adult literacy rate (%) 99 99 68 34
The given table data compares the average proportion of social and economic indicators in four different mentioned countries of the world in 1994.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that, Japan were more popular in terms of various indicators than all of its counterparts whereas Zaire had the least developed nation according to the United Nations statistics.
As a matter of fact, individual yearly income of Japan were the highest than others three countries in 1994. With US$ 15760 as per capita income Japan stood for the largest wealthy country whereas Canada with 11100 stands for the second popular nation for earning individual income in the same year. Similarly, children mortality rate in Japan were just above the Canada (78 and 76 individual respectively) whilst Zaire have lowest proportion of life expectancy at birth then Peru in the same year (about 47 and 51 child respectively). Moreover, each Canadian people consumed the highest proportion of daily calories in 1994, on the other hand, the quantity of calories consumed by the people of Japan, Peru and Zaire respectively holds the second, third and last positions.
Adult literacy rate of Canada and Japan were similar at 99%, however, Peru have the twice as much young literacy then that of 34% in Zaire. It is worth noticing that, Zarie have the lowest number of social and economic indicators in all categories among the others four countries in 1994.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | SandraWolfie | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | saeed2751366 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | narsindi | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne 79
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 67
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 67
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part-time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the lowest'.
Suggestion: have the lowest
...76 individual respectively whilst Zaire have lowest proportion of life expectancy at birth ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'child' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'children'.
Suggestion: children
...n Peru in the same year about 47 and 51 child respectively. Moreover, each Canadian p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Peru) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...apan were similar at 99%, however, Peru have the twice as much young literacy then t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, third, whereas, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09361702128 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52454138205 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5778812866 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.625 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 5.23603664747 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22405100889 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106882791961 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860685345161 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155425024436 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537047043626 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.