The charts below provide information about energy generation by fuel type in Florida in two separate years.
The pie charts compare the amount of energy generation by fuel type in Florida in 2007 and 2022.
Overall, the use of natural gas and nuclear will increase considerably, however, the use of coal, oil and other will fall dramatically. In addition, renewables will face a small decrease.
In 2007, natural gas as a source of energy generation stood at 38.8% in Florida. Coal was not far behind, standing at 29.3%. Nuclear and other both accounted for just about a tenth of energy generation. Nevertheless, oil and renewables indicated a small proportion of energy generation in 2007: 6.7% of oil and 2.1% of renewables.
In contrast, it is predicted that natural gas will face a sharp increase by 2022. It will become 54.4%, which is more than a half of energy generation. In addition, nuclear will rise to 15.9% by 2022. However, oil and other will decrease considerably to 1.1% and 3.4% respectively. Coal will drop to just over a fifth of energy generation, when renewables will fall to only 1.5%.
- The table below gives information about the participation of 11 14 year olds by gender in extreme sports in the UK in 2003 72
- The charts below provide information about energy generation by fuel type in Florida in two separate years 76
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011 74
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011. 61
- The charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip from 2009 to 2011 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84978386593 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5317997959 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.75 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146160191871 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633128069099 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958124458912 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132601579292 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132873782971 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.