In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
In modern life nowadays, citizens tend to live independently or only stay with a few members in their families as a common trend. It may result in some detrimental effects to mankind but I strongly believe that there are still many benefits when people are capable of adapting to live with large families.
On the one hand, people sometimes find it hard to face up to a self-governing life which pose a threat to them in some circumstances due to the lack of cognitive abilities. First of all, in case of busy employees, they may struggle with their daily life because they have to cope with many problems without support from their parents. Secondly, if many members in the families live together, there is no doubt that the relationship between people will be maintained. For instance, when people need advice for their work, expose to older generations in their families is a good way to accumulate a lot of experiences.
Turning to other side of the argument, there are two main advantages if people attempt to stay with their families. People are devoted themselves to save up money because they do not have to spend lots of their time to do housework. As a result, if they can avoid working overload that have an impact on their work quality, they will be triumphant. In addition, instead of being alone, they should stay with a large household to enhance the sentiment between people in the families. According to the analysis of many scientists, they assert that people today get familiar to the independent life which leads to many harmful effects to face-to-face connection of people especially when the technological advances in recent years.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that people may have more freedom in an alone life, I completely believe that when staying with families with a huge number of members is a good way to maintain the cultural uniqueness of large household.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Lê Thị Hoài Như | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | meoluoi | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Government should ban abortion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 11
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86153846154 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75178435924 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529230769231 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3072838369 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167877784178 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708330584689 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500972172533 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120238020832 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279282584069 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.