The line graph compares the expenditure on books in Germany,France,Italy and Austria from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that German people spent significantly more money than people in the other countries in term of books. Moreover, all four countries witnessed a rise in expenditure of this item throughout the 10-year period.
While Germans were the highest overall spenders, with an itial point of 80 million dollars on books in 1995, the figure of Austria was significantly lower , at only about 30 millions dollars. However, the gap in spending between these two countries narrowed as the expenditure on books in Austria increased considerably, reaching a peak of slightly above 6 million dollars in the final year. Despite some fluctuations , the amount of money spent on books in German increased and finished at roughly 95 millions dollars throughout 10 years
The spending figures on books in Italy and France, which accounted for 50 and about 55 million dollars respectively in 1995 , followed a smiliar fluctuating upward trend over the period. By the year 2005, the amount of money spent on books in France reached a highest point of around 75 millions dollar , 8 millions higher than that of Italy.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , France
...ares the expenditure on books in Germany,France,Italy and Austria from 1995 to 2005. O...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...igure of Austria was significantly lower , at only about 30 millions dollars. Howe...
^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he final year. Despite some fluctuations , the amount of money spent on books in G...
^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 55 million dollars respectively in 1995 , followed a smiliar fluctuating upward t...
^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... money spent on books in France reached a highest point of around 75 millions dol...
^
Line 4, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ghest point of around 75 millions dollar , 8 millions higher than that of Italy. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1256281407 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93522488881 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0289739952 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.714285714 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211170322236 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11334920452 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977948842756 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160858380416 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104892991571 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.