Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Is it a positive development?
Nowadays, tourist industries are being increased expenditure on by numerous developing countries. Although this improvement brings plenty of benefits, I would argue that it has some adverse effects.
On the one hand, a large number of advantages can easily be seen from improving this industry, especially those developing countries. First of all, the tourist industry probably gains many profits for countries in case that government invests approximately in it. Some newly destination in developing countries, for example, Bangkok in Thailand or Da Nang in Vietnam are becoming more and more attractive for tourists and those apparently brings a great amount of wealth for countries, and with that capital, developing countries have potential to spend on other industries. Secondly, the tourist industry not only accumulates much wealth but also acquiring a reputation for countries. Reputation is really crucial for developing countries by virtue of attracting investment from foreign business, development of the service industry, the chance of co-operating with other countries,….
On the other hand, expanding the tourist industry presumably suffers some drawbacks. Initially, plenty of tourist attractions have been damaged dramatically by visitors. For instance, many islands, beaches, and rivers are filled with rubbish which was thrown by the visitors and it is causing environmental pollution and individuals’ health problems. This is a hot issue in the tourist industry and it needs to be deal with as fast as possible. Moreover, enormous unknown destinations such as resorts, hotels,… are abandoned for a long time which costs much money because of inaccurate expenditure.
In conclusion, despite improving tourist industries are essential for developing countries at the hand of those benefits, this industry has some disadvantages which must be come up with.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-23 | minh huyen | 78 | view |
- some people are born to be leaders, while others believe leadership can be learnt. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The charts below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010, with projected sales for 2020.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant. 67
- Whether or not someone achievestheir aimsis mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Being a celebrity - such as a famous film star or sports personality - brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think a celebrity bring more benefit or more problems? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...some adverse effects. On the one hand, a large number of advantages can easily be seen from impr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 882, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...nce of co-operating with other countries,…. On the other hand, expanding the tour...
^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...own destinations such as resorts, hotels,… are abandoned for a long time which cos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73571428571 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15727213698 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9038192702 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2433780207 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089708900354 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639839171152 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144926661923 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565913647636 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.