The line graph illustrates the proportion of household recycling in three nations (UK, France, Germany) over a period from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the percentage experienced an upward trend in UK and Germany, contrast to a downward trend in France.
In particular, the percentage of UK was around 35% in the beginning, then increasing marginally by 5% to 40% in 2007 and remained stable in 2009. However, in the next 2 years, UK underwent a significant soar by nearly 15% to 55% in 2011. During 4 years from 2011 to the end of the research (2015), it continued to rise and reached a peak at 60% in the last year.
Germany, which started at the lowest rate in three countries (20%), had the most considerable and gradual growth by almost 25% to around 45% in 6 years ( from 2005 to 2011). In the next four years, a marked and steady increase to just over 60% in 2015 was recorded.
The last country was France, whose rate stood at 50%, the highest rate in the first year of the research. However, in the next 8 years, a significant slump by 20% to reach the bottom at 30% in 2011 was recorded.By the end of the research, the proportion of household recycling increased slightly by 10% to 40%; therefore, France became the country which had the lowest rate in 2015.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 73
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- A person worth's nowadays seems to be judged accounting to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this opinion ? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries 20%, had the most considerable and gradual growth by almost 25% to arou...
^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h by almost 25% to around 45% in 6 years from 2005 to 2011. In the next four year...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... the bottom at 30% in 2011 was recorded.By the end of the research, the proportion...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52192982456 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62992272443 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4462584732 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213470747219 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889175265962 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100072239954 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131335518837 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116862044692 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.