The line graph illustrates the proportion of household recycling in three nations (UK, France, Germany) over a period from 2005 to 2015.
Overall, the percentage experienced an upward trend in UK and Germany, contrast to a downward trend in France.
In particular, the percentage of UK was around 35% in the beginning, then increasing marginally by 5% to 40% in 2007 and remained stable in 2009. However, in the next 2 years, UK underwent a significant soar by nearly 15% to 55% in 2011. During 4 years from 2011 to the end of the research (2015), it continued to rise and reached a peak at 60% in the last year.
Germany, which started at the lowest rate in three countries (20%), had the most considerable and gradual growth by almost 25% to around 45% in 6 years ( from 2005 to 2011). In the next four years, a marked and steady increase to just over 60% in 2015 was recorded.
The last country was France, whose rate stood at 50%, the highest rate in the first year of the research. However, in the next 8 years, a significant slump by 20% to reach the bottom at 30% in 2011 was recorded.By the end of the research, the proportion of household recycling increased slightly by 10% to 40%; therefore, France became the country which had the lowest rate in 2015.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 73
- A person worth's nowadays seems to be judged accounting to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this opinion ? 89
- Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries 20%, had the most considerable and gradual growth by almost 25% to arou...
^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h by almost 25% to around 45% in 6 years from 2005 to 2011. In the next four year...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... the bottom at 30% in 2011 was recorded.By the end of the research, the proportion...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52192982456 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62992272443 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4462584732 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213470747219 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889175265962 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100072239954 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131335518837 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116862044692 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.