In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Living alone or in small family units have been becoming a frequent subject of debate with strong arguments for and against. From my viewpoint, I contend that this is a downward movement for some reasons
First, since dwellers have no longer live together in a family, it weakens the strength of members’ relationships. In fact, grandfathers or grandmothers could not converse with their children as they used to. Besides, children live without parents’ supervision is problematic. In term of studies, they feel free to do what they want in lieu of obeying with parents’ demands. They show less interest in sharing their thoughts or issues with parents. As a result, lacking consideration from members of the family, children could face the possibility of depression, autism, etc.
Secondly, this trend could be a new social threat if extended families completely discarded. The older generation confronts with the challenge of living a poor life, even turning into homeless. Without careness, and help from families, the government takes responsibility for improving their life via social welfares: household, pension, medical care services. However, the problem of land for more housing becomes complexed. By virtue of the rapid increase in urban population is the main reason for the serious shortages of housing, the national officials have to destroy forests for building large dwellings for citizens.
In conclusion, it could not be denied that societies have a penchant for living alone, I completely believe that staying in a large group does bring them enormous values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Lê Thị Hoài Như | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | meoluoi | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4297188755 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94338333 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4475443775 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104332194948 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376611610137 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514529886856 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071504467468 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444828138771 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.