The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The line chart illustrates three categories had accounted for air pollutants (million tonnes), in the UK, from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the total amount of air pollutants fell over the period. Included in it, the most significant dropped was from the industry.
There was a dramatic decrease in the total air pollutants from 7 (1990) to 4 million tonnes (1999). Between 1999 and 2005, this figure continuously declined from 4 to just over 3 million tonnes. By contrast, the number of air pollutants in transport slightly fluctuated around 1 million tonnes for sixteen years.
The figure of air pollutants in industry reduced suddenly from 5.5 (1990) to 3 million tonnes (1996). In the next 10 years, this number gradually fell to 1 million tonnes. Besides that, the air pollutants of households contributed 0.8 million tonnes at the beginning of this time. Although this figure small fluctuated over the periods, it also remained below 1 million tonnes (2005).
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
2019-10-06 | prathamesh27 | 84 | view |
2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 67
- The pie charts below show the proportion of the whole school expenditure in five differences sources over the periods between 1981 and 2001. 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...gories had accounted for air pollutants million tonnes, in the UK, from 1990 to 2005. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n tonnes, in the UK, from 1990 to 2005. Overall, the total amount of air polluta...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und 1 million tonnes for sixteen years. The figure of air pollutants in industry...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09554140127 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70284430882 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.3920086634 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280831150076 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130080051222 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854499436943 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201073842381 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616405217056 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.