The following bar chart reflets the frequency of Americans dined out in the eateries providing fast-food from 2003 to 2013.
Ranging from 2003 to 2013 , the tendies varid in each group accounting how often they ate in the relating restaurant.Those who dined daily and who refused fast food decreased 1% during the first three years, whereas the proportion stablised until 2013. So did the ones ate a few times a year, though this group increased almost 2% from 2003 to 2006.
To the ones grouped on several times and once a week, they shared the similar tendency, climbing from 17% and 31% to 20% and 33% respectively, ending with 16% and 28% seperately. By contrast, an opposite tendency was observed in people ate once or twice a month, which dropped by 5% between 2003 and 2006, bouncing to approximately 33% in 2013.
In conclusion, slight decreases occured on the those who ate fast food daily and who declined to it.Besides,obviouse decline were found in the groups dined several time and once per week. Futhermore , tiny upwards tendency was shown in the people ate a few times a year comparing with a noiceable one in the ones dining once or twice a month, Finally, the proportion of groups eating once a week and once or twice a month generally accounts for one third of the whole population.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are some more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...03 to 2013. Ranging from 2003 to 2013 , the tendies varid in each group account...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Those
...ten they ate in the relating restaurant.Those who dined daily and who refused fast fo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: DID_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eat'?
Suggestion: eat
...n stablised until 2013. So did the ones ate a few times a year, though this group i...
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the similar tendency, climbing from 17% and 31% to 20% and 33% respectively, end...
^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
... fast food daily and who declined to it.Besides,obviouse decline were found in the grou...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , obviouse
...ood daily and who declined to it.Besides,obviouse decline were found in the groups dined ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
... decline were found in the groups dined several time and once per week. Futhermore , tiny up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...veral time and once per week. Futhermore , tiny upwards tendency was shown in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, so, third, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79203539823 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76421241365 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579646017699 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1658006151 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.714285714 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147381852478 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809619261445 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547019653856 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107379330139 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397890089775 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.