Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer?
A controversy has arisen about which it is more important if working fast and risk making mistakes or working slowly and do everything correctly. Supporters of the idea believe that when people work fast they are able to make more mistakes than if they work slowly. I consider that this is completely true and I agree with them. In the following essay, I will explain with two reasons why I think so.
To begin with, let me start telling you that working it is not as easy as many people think. When we have to make a project, we have to make it carefully and with all the requirements, otherwise, the assignment could have issues. For instance, I am architect and I have to create building projects for big companies. My work is very detailed, so I have to do it slowly and stay focus in what I am doing. If I make a mistake, I could cause millions of lose to the company. Within the past of the years I have learnt how to work slowly to make everything correct.
The second reason of working slowly is that give the possibility to the people who is making the work to check if the assignment is adequate or not. Also, when an individual work without pressure the work will be successfully. However, if the person who is developing the activity is working under pressure the final result will be a disaster. My personal experience is an example of this. About ten days ago, I took my National Board Dental Examination. I knew that the test it will be against clock and It would give me a hard time. These kinds of tests are under pressure and you do not have the opportunity to check the exam because you are always running out time. When the final result came out, I did not score really good. If the test has been without clock I am pretty sure that I had got better score.
Finally, I strongly believe that working slowly always will bring better results than working fast. Everything that people make fast mostly will have mistake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- working four days a week or not 60
- twins studies 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- elephants have a surprising behavior 65
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'architected'.
Suggestion: architected
...t could have issues. For instance, I am architect and I have to create building projects ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... came out, I did not score really good. If the test has been without clock I am pr...
^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'bring'.
Suggestion: will always bring
... I strongly believe that working slowly always will bring better results than working fast. Every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'mistaken'.
Suggestion: mistaken
... that people make fast mostly will have mistake.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, really, second, so, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45505617978 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45829370261 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.872594164 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5238095238 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9523809524 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358693862862 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103586267648 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899231505285 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231605910872 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952272160979 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.