Some believe that it is good for a country's culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think that it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversial issue about the content of movies and television programs. Some culturalists suggest presenting the local culture more frequently in this content, while some social workers believe that foreign media content should also be available in the same volume. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agrees with the idea of equal multiculturalism on TV.
Let us start with the reasons why some culturalists state that authorities should stimulate interest in regional culture by giving a priority to the national video content. The first justification is that people have different preferences in video content. It rarely happens that all TV viewers enjoy local media, because mostly they prefer various programs, such talk shows and soap operas, made in other countries with their specific style. Another reason is that diversity in TV programs lead to multiculturalism. International media industry normally promotes the tolerance to both customs and traditions, so prioritizing domestic culture on media would destroy harmonic relationship between nations. Furthermore, it may offend the feeling of cultural minorities. Many countries are usually multicultural, so these communities will resent, if officials deprive them of cultural choice on TV.
However, some social workers claim that, regardless of being imported, the cultural diversity on TV should be maintained further. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it can boost the public interest in national culture. Concentrating movies and TV shows around the local culture may raise the desire of minor social groups in learning it as well as participating in national festivals. Secondly, it also can encourage people to learn the official language. Many cultural groups are reluctant to study the official language, but the widespread usage of it on TV would make them less resistant. Moreover, movies with local cultural aspects may trigger patriotism. Many countries regularly encounter the problem with the lack of patriotism, but with the help of culturally-orientated movies, they would start to love the motherland and contribute to its prosperity.
In conclusion, even though some culturalists argue that the government should focus TV content on promoting domestic culture, I think that it should enable a wide range of choice, no matter whether or not it is imported.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-15 | Gokhan_Kurt | 67 | view |
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 78
- More and more children are accessing the Internet unsupervised This can sometimes put them at risk What problems do you think parents face when dealing with their children using the Internet How can this problem be solved 89
- These days, in many countries few people want to become teachers. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved? 78
- With the development of online there is no future for the radio To what extent do you agree 50
- Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive findings from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nable a wide range of choice, no matter whether or not it is imported.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54347826087 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07424280256 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589673913043 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3748149295 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.368421053 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189369003665 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549322653203 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349146562542 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112748834733 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320833824834 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.