In this infographic, there are 2 charts: a bar chart and a pie chart. The bar chart clearly presents the number of people attending various courses, while the pie chart well compares the proportion of participants, divided by the percentage of ages.
In the bar chart, it is obvious that the quantity of attendants was 160 (65 males and 95 females) in total, most of whom (60) joined the language course. Meanwhile, the painting course was the second most popular, followed by the drama course, because there were 55 members and 30 members in the courses respectively. Finally, the figure of partakers (15) for the sculpture course accounted for the lowest.
In the pie chart, it can be seen that the proportion of the ages of participants by joining the language course were the largest of nearly over one-second of participants in total (42%) by 50 years old or over. Meanwhile, there is almost as much attending the painting course as attending the drama course, or at 26% and 16% by 40-49 age group and 30-39 age group respectively. Interesting, 11% and 5% remaining of taking courses by 20s and under 20s in respective made up for the lowest.
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York in last year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 54
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should praents be made by law to immunise their children against common disease or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children ?Give reasons for your 78
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012. 56
- The Bar Chart Below Shows The Numbers Of Men And Women Attending Various Evening Courses At An Adult Education Centre In The Year 2009. The Pie Chart Gives Information About The Ages Of These Course Participants? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pture course accounted for the lowest. In the pie chart, it can be seen that th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77386934673 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77483414872 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1047392188 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316492643655 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133101071015 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682042957756 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212532239715 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595808300288 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.